State v. Allard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
Two questions are presented in this appeal from convictions of aggravated felonious sexual assault and first-degree assault: (1) whether a pre-arrest photographic lineup deprived the defendant of his due process rights because it was unnecessarily suggestive under the totality of the circumstances; and (2) whether a statement by the Trial Judge (Contas, J.) in his jury instructions diminished the State’s burden of proof in the minds of the jurors. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.
The victim in this case, a twenty-year-old female, was hitchhiking between Keene and Peterborough on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. PerronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. GullickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HungerfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. LaRoseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FournierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.