Legal Opinion
State v. LeClair
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 7, 1978No. 7819PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The questions we consider in this armed robbery case are whether it was proper to admit certain identification evidence and whether defendant, without being separately indicted, could be sentenced under RSA 159:2 (Supp. 1975), which provides that when a person commits a crime when armed with a pistol, he shall in addition to the punishment provided for the crime be guilty of a Class B felony. We answer both questions in the negative.
Defendant was indicted for armed robbery of one Poulicakos, a service station attendant. Prior to trial, he moved to suppress an out-of-court identification and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. DuboseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. VeniosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MelvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.