Legal Opinion
State v. Addison
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 19, 2010No. 2009-048PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Michael Addison, appeals his convictions for armed robbery and being a felon in possession of a weapon. See RSA 636:1 (2007); RSA 159:3 (2002). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) erred by: (1) denying his motions to continue; (2) refusing to give cross-racial identification jury instructions; (3) informing the venire that he was charged with the murder of a police officer, see State v. Addison, 159 N.H. 87 (2009); and (4) denying his motion to suppress an in-court identification. We affirm.
The following facts are not in dispute or are supported by the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Lam Luong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In the Matter of Robert Kempton and Peggy KemptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.