Bolton v. Bluestein
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. “Where a party relies on the law of another State as furnishing the basis for a right of recovery or defense different from what it would be under the laws of this State, or the common law, the law of the foreign State should be pleaded and proved.” Independent Order of Puritans v. Cadden, 25 Ga. App. 27 (102 S. E. 454); Southern Express Co. v. Manato, 134 Ga. 445 (7) (67 S. E. 944, 137 Am. St. R. 227). Mere reference to the volume and section of the compilation in which it is alleged the law appears is not sufficient. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Barton, 14 Ga. App. 160 (80 S. E. 530).
2.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Epps v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Southern Express Co. v. HanawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Minter v. KentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Hennon v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Brown v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Motz v. Alropa CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- KMM Industries, Inc. v. Professional Placement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.