Legal Opinion
Hennon v. Hardin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 20, 1948No. 32230PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The sole question presented by the demurrers and argued before this court is whether the petition as amended set forth a cause of action based upon the gross negligence of the defendant.
“ ‘One riding by invitation and gratuitously in another’s automobile can not recover for injury caused by the other’s negligence in driving, unless it amounted to gross negligence.’ Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399 (106 S. E. 297); Harris v. Reid, 30 Ga. App. 187 (117 S. E. 256); Peavy v. Peavy, 36 Ga. App. 202 (136 S. E. 96); Bolton v. Bluestein, 55 Ga. App. 782 (191 S. E. 388). Questions of negligence and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Epps v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Harris v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Peavy v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Thomas v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Hines v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Sammons v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Munday v. BrissetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.