Legal Opinion

Minter v. Kent

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1940No. 28095PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

J. M. Kent brought suit against J. E. Minter and others, doing business as Clay Products Exchange, to recover damages because of injuries sustained by him on account of the alleged negligence of the defendants. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the exception is to the overruling of the defendants’ motion for new trial. The evidence introduced on the hearing was substantially as follows: The plaintiff, on August 29, 1938, between 6 and 6 :30 p. m., was driving his automobile about fifteen miles per hour south on Brittingham Street, or Silk Shirt Alley, an unpaved…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Taylor v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Lay v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Float-Away Door Company and National Surety Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Frances H. Turner, as Guardian for Frank N. Turner v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. F. E. Fortenberry & Sons, Inc. v. MalmbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API