Motz v. Alropa Corporation
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
The rights of the parties to a contract made and to be performed in another State are controlled not only by its pertinent statutes but by the decisions of its appellate courts construing and applying those statutes. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Yates, 299 U. S. 178, 181, 182 (57 Sup. Ct. 129, 81 L. ed. 106); Burns Mortgage Co. v. Fried, 292 U. S. 487 (54 Sup. Ct. 813, 78 L. ed. 1380, 92 A. L. R. 1193); Trustees of Williams Hospital v. Nisbet, 189 Ga. 807 (b), 811 (7 S. E. 2d, 737); U. S. Constitution, art. 4, § 1 (Code, § 1-401). But where only some rule of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Slaton v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Thomas v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Georgia Sprinkler Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- In re Tri-State Crematory LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- Coon v. Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Pacolet Manufacturing Co. v. Crescent Textiles, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- White v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.