Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Tuck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

We are concerned on this appeal solely with the sufficiency of the first cause of action set forth in the complaint before us. In essence, after specifying that the plaintiff and the defendant are residents of this State, the complaint alleges that the defendant, upon leading the plaintiff to believe that he intended to marry her, arranged a sham marriage ceremony in New Jersey—with bogus judge, pretended witnesses and faked papers — and that the plaintiff, accepting the bona fides of the defendant and the legitimacy of the ceremony, proceeded to live with him as his lawfully wedded wife.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Blossom v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Jekshewitz v. GroswaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Friedman v. LibinNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Benintendi v. BenintendiNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Spindel v. SpindelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  3. Roy v. HartogsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
  4. Coopersmith v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Roy v. HartogsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API