Roy v. Hartogs
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
A complaint should not be dismissed on the opening statement of counsel unless, accepting as true all facts stated in the opening and resolving in plaintiffs favor all material facts in issue, plaintiff nevertheless is precluded from recovery as a matter of law (Rivera v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 11 AD2d 7, 8, 9). Counsel asserted in the opening statement that the defendant, a psychiatrist, had treated the plaintiff, as his patient, during the period March, 1969 through September, 1970. It was further averred that, during the last 13 months of her treatment, plaintiff was induced to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sanders v. RolnickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- Tuck v. TuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Corgan v. MuehlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Mathie v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.