Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 14, 2015No. 3:08-CV-0626-LRH-VPCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

Before the court is plaintiff the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians *1216of Nevada Housing Authority’s (“Te-Moak Housing Authority”) motion for summary judgment'. Doc. # 18.1 Defendants the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); Steve Preston, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; Paula Blunt, General Deputy Assistant for Public and Indian Housing; and Deborah Lalancette, Director of the Office of Grants Management for the Office of Native American Programs (collectively “defendants”) filed an opposition (Doc. # 21)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API