Legal Opinion

Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1923No. 5,214PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In their complaint plaintiffs set forth two causes of action. In the first they claim damages for two coats lost through the alleged negligence of the defendant. In the second cause of action they allege that at Devils Lake, North Dakota, for a valuable consideration then paid by them, they deposited with the defendant in its parcel-room for safekeeping two traveling-bags with their contents; that thereafter on the same date they demanded the property, but the defendant failed and neglected to make return, to their damage in the sum of $619.

*234The answer of the defendant to the first cause of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Healy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Ferris v. McNallyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Taussig v. Bode & HaslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Pannoni v. Board of Trustees, Browning School District No. 9Montana Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API