Legal Opinion

Taussig v. Bode & Haslett

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1901No. S.F. No. 1572PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

The defendant is proprietor of a bonded warehouse in the city of San Francisco. On the 20th of January, 1896, it received from the plaintiffs, and stored in its warehouse, sixty-four barrels of spirits. About the 4th of March, following, it discovered that some of the barrels were leaking, and immediately notified the plaintiffs, who, upon examination, found that eight barrels showed excessive outage. One barrel was practically empty, three or four leaking badly, and the others to some extent. The total amount of loss, over and above the ordinary allowance for evaporation, was 181-i gallons,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API