Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Burgess

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1936No. 8 Div. 317PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The only questions presented by this record arose on the pleadings, and the principal insistence of error, as indicated by the assignment of errors, is the action of the court in overruling defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's replications two and four.

Appellee sued appellants on a promissory note, and among other defenses defendants pleaded as follows:

"The defendants for further answer to the complaint plead and say:
"A. That the defendant, H. H. Hamilton in Nov. 1930 was a practicing attorney at law and is the principal debtor herein, the defendant S. L. Hamilton being a surety merely. That…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Langdon v. ConlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Elliott v. McClellandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. Farrell v. Betts & BettsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Holloway v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. BurgessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API