Langdon v. Conlin
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Cuming county. Action on contract for services in securing employment of defendant as an attorney at law. Tried below before Graves, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Oldham, C.
In this case the plaintiff in the court below brought his action against the defendant alleging, among other things, that the defendant was a resident and practicing attorney of Omaha, Nebraska; that “on or about the 1st day of November, 1893, plaintiff, at request of defendant, entered into the services of the defendant to get parties in this and adjoining counties, or from any place, who wished the services of an attorney for litigation or for advice, to employ said defendant as their attorney, and said plaintiff was also to assist the defendant in looking after and procuring…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- License Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lyon v. HusseyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Alpers v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lucas v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Chreste v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.