Hamilton v. Burgess
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Stipulations in notes and mortgages by which the debtor contracts to pay the attorney’s fee of the creditor means the attorney’s fee actually and reasonably incurred by reason of the default of the debt- or.
If the creditor and attorney agree in advance upon the fee to be paid to the attorney, this, if not excessive, is the measure of the fee which is chargeable against the debtor. It matters not that the contract stipulate a specific amount, 10 per cent, for example, as a reasonable attorney’s fee. Such contract is one of indemnity merely, to protect the creditor against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faulk & Co. v. Hobbie Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Tompkins v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. RoyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lyons v. JacowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Hamilton v. BurgessAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re BanksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1982
- Willow Lake Resi. Asso. v. Juliano, 2081099 (ala.civ.app. 8-27-2010)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Selman v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Joseph v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Alabama Educ. Association v. BlackCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.