Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1934No. Docket No. 9356PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for a writ of mandate.
Plaintiff was a civil service employee, classified as a “carpenter foreman”, and was employed as such in the Bureau of Power and Light in the Department of Water and Power. In July, 1928, his employment was terminated because of “lack of funds”. More than two years thereafter plaintiff commenced this proceeding seeking to compel the defendants to give him employment as a civil service employee and to pay him his salary from the time his employment was terminated.
Plaintiff alleged,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Corrigan v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Fitzsimmons v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Gardner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Vansuch v. State Ex Rel. FetchOhio Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Childress v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kabisius v. Board of Playground & RecreationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dawson v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.California Court of Appeal · 1934