Childress v. Peterson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, J., pro tem.
In this proceeding in mandamus the trial court entered a judgment which reinstates plaintiffs in the positions of policewomen of the city of San Diego, and directs payment of their salaries at the rate of $157 per month from date of commencement of the action. Defendants, the city, its officers and agents, have appealed.
Prior to 1939, plaintiffs reached the status of classified employees of the city under its civil service rules and regulations (Charter of San Diego, art. VIII, Stats. 1931, p. 2906). On June 22, 1939, the acting chief of police addressed a letter to each…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- O'Neill v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Jenkins v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by16 opinions
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of San Antonio v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Rexstrew v. City of Huntington ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.