Legal Opinion

Kabisius v. Board of Playground & Recreation

California Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1935No. L. A. 15181PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

About a year prior to October 3, 1930, the petitioner herein had become a permanent employee as a beach guard in the department of recreation and playground of Los Angeles city. On September 6,1930, he was notified by a Mr. Drake, director of beaches, that he would be laid off at the end of the month owing to a lack of funds. On the day following, September 7th, the supervisor of aquatics, in the presence of Drake and other beach guards, again notified petitioner of the intended layoff. On October 3, 1930, the petitioner received through the mail the following letter addressed to him:

“Dear…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People Ex Rel. Corrigan v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Fitzsimmons v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Livingstone v. MacGillivrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. O'Neill v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. ChuidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Sierra Club v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API