Legal Opinion
Ruff v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1985No. 84-3809PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Larry E. Ruff appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for judicial review of an adverse decision of the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. Because the district court had no jurisdiction, we affirm.
Larry Ruff claims to be the biological son of Warren M. Ruff, an enrolled member of the Klamath Tribe, who died intestate in 1970. Warren Ruff’s estate was entitled to a per capita share of an Indian Claims Commission judgment awarded to the Klamath Indian Tribe in 1964. Distribution of the claim monies is governed by *840the Klamath Judgment Distribution Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 897, 25…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Love v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Currier v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- George Kicking Woman v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, and Leo Lee Old PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Love v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Sierra Ass'n for Environment v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.