Efimenko v. The Catalina Marketing Corporation Group Life Plan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANNA EFIMENKO, Case No. 21-cv-01550-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 THE CATALINA MARKETING Re: Dkt. No. 31 CORPORATION GROUP LIFE PLAN, et 11 al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Catalina Marketing 15 Corporation Group Life Plan and Catalina Marketing Corporation (collectively, “Catalina”). Dkt. 16 No. 31. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the 17 matter is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.