Legal Opinion

Windham v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 31, 1995No. 93-CA-002439-MRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Judge:

Appellant, Sheila Windham (Windham), appeals from a summary judgment entered in Warren Circuit Court declaring that she is not entitled to uninsured or underinsured coverage, to stack liability coverage, or to prejudgment interest on her liability claim under a policy of automobile insurance issued by appellee, PAFCO General Insurance Company (PAFCO). After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm.

Windham’s decedent, Toni Potter (Potter), owned two vehicles insured by PAFCO, which policy of insurance included underin-sured motorist (UIM) coverage. On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Breaux v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Chaffin v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompaniesKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hamilton v. Allstate Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hodgkiss-WarrickKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Baxter v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  4. American Home Assurance Company v. Frank M. Hughes Sheila W. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API