Legal Opinion

Freitas v. City of Atwater

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1961No. Civ. 9718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

The city of Atwater, the Foremost Food and Chemical Company, Inc., a corporation, and the Davis Canning Company, a corporation, have appealed from an order granting plaintiffs an injunction which restrained the appellants as follows:

1. The city of Atwater was permanently enjoined from (a) delivering to the Atwater Main any more water than the capacity of its three pipelines into it, or delivering any cannery waste or any sewage effluent from the city’s new sewer treatment plant; and (b) enlarging in any way the size of its three pipelines or increasing the burden on the Atwater Main.

2. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Engineering Etc. Corp. v. Longridge Inv. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Palmer v. HolcombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
  2. In Re Marriage of DaviesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Reinsch v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API