Alwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. JoAnn and Walter Alwin appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claim against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. The Alwins argue that the circuit court erred by concluding, as a matter of law, that Wis. Stat. § I74.02(l)(a), 1 commonly known as "the dog bite statute," is inapplicable to the facts of their case. Although § 174.02(l)(a) is a strict liability statute applicable to the instant facts, we nevertheless determine that State Farm's liability under the statute is precluded by public policy considerations. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
¶2. The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Fortier v. Flambeau Plastics Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Kenefick v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Erdmann v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Hamilton, Shirley v. Prime Communications, L.P.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.