Legal Opinion

Erdmann v. Progressive Northern Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 8, 2011No. 2009AP2457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

¶ 1. Carissa Erdmann, by her guardian ad litem, Theresa Laughlin, appeals summary judgments in favor of Progressive Northern Insurance Company and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company. She claims the circuit court erroneously concluded that judicial public policy bars her strict liability claim under Wisconsin's dog injury statute, Wis. Stat. § 174.02.1 We agree, and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2. Allstate alternatively claims it is entitled to summary judgment because its insured was not a statutory owner for purposes of the dog injury statute. We conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Smaxwell v. BayardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russo v. ZeiglerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Kelly v. BergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Molitor v. VoutiristasDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API