Legal Opinion
Kenefick v. Hitchcock
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 25, 1994No. 93-2318PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.
David and Carolyn Hitchcock appeal from an order granting summary judgment dismissing their third-party complaint against Federated Mutual Insurance Company. The Hitchcocks, owners of a service station, were sued by Emmett and Amelia Kenefick, who owned property adjacent to the station and claimed that leakage from the Hitchcocks' underground gasoline storage tanks contaminated area groundwater, causing them damage.
The Hitchcocks contended that their liability for any such damage was covered by two insurance policies issued by Federated: a liability policy effective from March 15, 1985, to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- The Lexington Insurance Company v. Rugg & Knopp, Inc., and the Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Doyle v. EngelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- David M. Marks v. Houston Casualty CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Radke v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.