Commonwealth v. Mazarella
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The defendant was convicted of possessing and transporting intoxicating liquor. The assignments relate to the validity of the indictment; to the refusal of the court to admit evidence of a remark made by a by-stander when the sheriff was taking the defendant to jail; to the refusal of the court to withdraw a juror because of a remark made by the district attorney in his address to the jury; to the refusal of the court to direct ¡a verdict for the defendant because it was not proved that the thing seized was intoxicating liquor, or that it was intended to be used for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Commonwealth v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Commonwealth v. AmatoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. Magid and DicksteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. WidemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth of Penna. v. GatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.