Legal Opinion

Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. v. Deuel (In re Deuel)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California

Decided September 28, 2012No. Bankruptcy No. 04-02787-LT7; Adversary No. 04-90460-LTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION1

LAURA S. TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

In 2004, Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. (“Chase”) initiated this adversary proceeding. The underlying facts are set out in numerous prior decisions including, most recently, a Ninth Circuit decision decided adversely to Chase. See Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, Inc. v. Taxel (In re Deuel), 594 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2010). In briefest summary, Chase extended a loan to debtor Jill Deuel (“Debtor”) and her non-filing, now former spouse, Will Deuel,2 and the Deuels used the loan proceeds, in part, to repay Chase on account of a previous loan. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Saucedo v. Mercury Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asphalt Prof'ls Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. Carmel Financing, LLC v. SchoenmannDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. In re: Francisco Tinajero, Jr. and Jacqueline SanchezUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API