Legal Opinion

Thompson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1982No. 80-820PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

The issue presented by this appeal is whether evidence which is the fruit of an unconstitutional search and seizure may be considered and relied upon by a sentencing court at a probation revocation hearing. We hold that, absent egregious circumstances, the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule is inapplicable in the context of a probation revocation hearing and therefore affirm the court’s decision to revoke appellant’s probation.

Pursuant to a plea bargaining agreement, appellant pled guilty to a charge of attempted unauthorized use of a vehicle and was sentenced to an…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Ex Parte CaffieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API