Legal Opinion
Haberland ex rel. Dex One Corp. v. Bulkeley
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 26, 2012No. 5:11-CV-463-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge.
On September 1, 2011, Brad Haberland (“Haberland” or “plaintiff’) filed this action derivatively on behalf of Dex One Corporation (“Dex One”). Compl. [D.E. 1]. Haberland’s complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment allegedly committed by Jonathan B. Bulkeley (“Bulkeley”), Eugene I. Davis (“Davis”), Richard L. Kuersteiner (“Kuersteiner”), W. Kirk Liddell (“Liddell”), Mark A. McEachen (“McEachen”), Alfred T. Mockett (“Mockett”), Alan F. Schultz (“Schultz”), Steven M. Blondy (“Blondy”), George F. Bednarz (“Bednarz”), Mark W. Hianik…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kruger v. Novant Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Butler v. Enhanced Equity Fund II, LP (In re American Ambulette & Ambulance Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Garnitschnig v. HorovitzDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Albright v. Vining-Sparks Secs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019