Legal Opinion

State v. Wicklund

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1982No. 47827-9PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Pursuant to RCW 2.06.030(d) and RAP 4.2, the following questions have been certified to us by the Court of Appeals, Division Three: (1) Do the provisions of RCW 10.77 apply to courts of limited jurisdiction so as to govern determination of competency in those courts? (2) If the provisions of RCW 10.77 do apply, are the provisions of RCW 10.77.060, requiring a formal psychiatric examination and report, mandatory or directory?

For the reasons stated below, we hold that determinations of competency in courts of limited jurisdiction are governed by RCW 10.77 and the formal psychiatric reports and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. TateWashington Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BebbWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API