State v. Dodd
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hale, J. —
Perhaps one who prefers confinement in an institution for the criminally insane to imprisonment in a regular penitentiary really is deranged. But t'he law makes no such assumption and vests in each trial judge a wide discretion in judging the mental competency of every defendant to stand trial or plead guilty. The trial judge may make his determination from many things, including the defendant’s appearance, demeanor, conduct, personal and family history, past behavior, medical and psychiatric reports and the statements of counsel.
Here the trial judge made such an evaluation, found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Brandon v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. TaftWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. McKeenWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WicklundWashington Supreme Court · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.