Legal Opinion

Boehner v. McDermott

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 20, 2004No. 98-0594(TFH)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff and Defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. Because both motions relate to the same set of facts and issues, the Court will rule on both motions simultaneously. Upon careful review of both motions, oppositions, replies thereto, and the entire record herein, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion in part and deny the motion in part, and the Court will grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs motion. 1

I. BACKGROUND

This case results from a disclosure made by Defendant James McDermott to members of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boehner v. McDermottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Boehner v. McDermottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API