Legal Opinion
Thacker v. New York Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 14, 1992No. Civ. S-92-363 LKKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
Before the court is defendant New York Life Insurance Company’s remaining motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 1 The motion is addressed to plaintiff’s eighth cause of action alleging a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962-68. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.
I
STANDARDS ON A MOTION TO DISMISS
On a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true. Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Doe v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re RubinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Wexco Inc. v. IMC, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.