Pehl v. Fanton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action to recover from defendant $300 for commissions alleged to be due. him for obtaining-a purchaser for certain real estate owned by defendant. Judgment was rendered for defendant, from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
As shown by the record, defendant on February 5, 1907, by a memorandum in writing, authorized plaintiff to sell the property therein described as lot No. 406 of Ontario Colony Lands, for the price of $11,000, payable one-half in cash and the balance in one year, with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hayden v. GrilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Barbour v. FlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hicks v. ChristesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ludy v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Dreyfus v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- United States Farm Land Co. v. DarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.