Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kirk

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 7, 1995No. 94-P-1499PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of assault and battery, G. L. c. 265, § 13A, after a jury-waived trial in the jury session of the Dedham District Court. He claims the judge erred in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty at the close of the Commonwealth’s case. After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, but disregarding evidence *226we decide was erroneously admitted at trial, we conclude that no rational trier of fact could have found an essential element of the crime charged — the identity of the victim’s assailant — beyond a.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LoperaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. NapolitanoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Murphy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. ForemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. IvyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API