Commonwealth v. Kirk
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of assault and battery, G. L. c. 265, § 13A, after a jury-waived trial in the jury session of the Dedham District Court. He claims the judge erred in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty at the close of the Commonwealth’s case. After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, but disregarding evidence *226we decide was erroneously admitted at trial, we conclude that no rational trier of fact could have found an essential element of the crime charged — the identity of the victim’s assailant — beyond a.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LoperaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. NapolitanoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Murphy v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ForemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. IvyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.