Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Napolitano

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 30, 1997No. 96-P-783PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

The defendant, Mark Napolitano, was convicted by a jury of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and assault and battery on Jennifer Botto. He contends that his trial was tainted by two unpreserved errors that created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice: (1) the trial judge allowed the Commonwealth to introduce damaging testimony regarding Botto’s out-of-court statements against him under the “excited utterance” (or “spontaneous exclamation”) exception to the hearsay rule, even though the statements did not properly fall within that exception; and (2) *550those…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SellonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WheltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. McCoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. McCormickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. HardyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API