Meinders v. Johnson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Defendants/Appellants Tim Johnson, Margie Walters, Arnold Johnson and Wyne-ma Johnson, E.J. Tucker and Betty Jean Tucker, William Hodges and Geraldine Hodges (Defendants) seek review of the trial court’s order granting a mandatory injunction, thereby directing Defendants to remedy surface and subsurface pollution from mineral exploration and production on property owned by Plaintiff/Appellee Don Meinders. In this proceeding, Defendants complain the trial court erred as a matter of both law and fact in granting injunctive relief, particularly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Braswell Shipyards, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lazy S Ranch Properties v. Valero Terminaling and DistributionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- B.H. v. Gold Fields Mining Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Morgan v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- CARNAHAN v. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Bristow First Assembly of God v. BP p.l.c.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.