Legal Opinion
B.H. v. Gold Fields Mining Corp.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 1, 2007No. 04-CV-0564-CVE-PJCPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EAGAN, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants Blue Tee Corp. and Gold Fields Mining Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.# 360) and Supplement to Blue Tee and Gold Field’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.# 421).
I
The Tar Creek Superfund Site (“Tar Creek”) is located in a 40 square mile area of northeastern Oklahoma that was historically the site of lead and zinc mining throughout the twentieth century. Tar Creek includes the communities of Picher, Cardin, Commerce, Quapaw, and North Miami in Ottawa County, Oklahoma. This case was brought on…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilmore v. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Lafalier v. LEAD-IMPACTED COMMUNITIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. Blue Tee Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Concerned Pastors for Action v. KhouriDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Sierra Club v. Chesapeake Operating, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.