Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1986No. 14702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was found guilty after nonju-ry trial “of Passed Vehicle Within 100 feet of Intersection as charged in the information”.

Although appellant does not challenge the information on appeal and in his brief states that it is sufficient, it is this court’s duty to determine the sufficiency of the information. Rule 30.20; State v. Rose, 428 S.W.2d 737, 741 (Mo.1968); State *549v. Eckard, 655 S.W.2d 596, 597 (Mo.App.1983); City of Kansas City v. Harbin, 600 S.W.2d 589, 592 (Mo.App.1980). The information must allege the essential facts constituting the offense sought to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Roach v. LachoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. State v. EckardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. City of Kansas v. HarbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goudeaux v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. QuigleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Turnage v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API