State v. Powell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was found guilty after nonju-ry trial “of Passed Vehicle Within 100 feet of Intersection as charged in the information”.
Although appellant does not challenge the information on appeal and in his brief states that it is sufficient, it is this court’s duty to determine the sufficiency of the information. Rule 30.20; State v. Rose, 428 S.W.2d 737, 741 (Mo.1968); State *549v. Eckard, 655 S.W.2d 596, 597 (Mo.App.1983); City of Kansas City v. Harbin, 600 S.W.2d 589, 592 (Mo.App.1980). The information must allege the essential facts constituting the offense sought to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Roach v. LachoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. EckardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- City of Kansas v. HarbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goudeaux v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. QuigleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Turnage v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988