State v. Wilson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
An information alleged the defendant committed the class D felony of promoting prostitution in the third degree in violation of § 567.070. A jury found him guilty. As authorized by the verdict, the court sentenced him to imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of $2,500.
The defendant attacks the sufficiency of the information. State v. Powell, 717 S.W.2d 548 (Mo.App.1986); State v. Eckard, 655 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.App.1983). A fundamental rule for determining the sufficiency of an information has been often restated. “The test for sufficiency of an indictment is ‘whether it contains…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Honeycutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- People v. GravenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- State v. EckardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.