Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1988No. 15298Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

An information alleged the defendant committed the class D felony of promoting prostitution in the third degree in violation of § 567.070. A jury found him guilty. As authorized by the verdict, the court sentenced him to imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of $2,500.

The defendant attacks the sufficiency of the information. State v. Powell, 717 S.W.2d 548 (Mo.App.1986); State v. Eckard, 655 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.App.1983). A fundamental rule for determining the sufficiency of an information has been often restated. “The test for sufficiency of an indictment is ‘whether it contains…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Honeycutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. People v. GravenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. State v. EckardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API