Legal Opinion

State v. Eckard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1983No. 45598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Cheryl Eckard appeals from her conviction in a jury trial of stealing over $150 by deceit. We reverse and remand.

The dispositive issue presented is whether the information under which appellant was tried and convicted is defective for failure to state the factual basis of the alleged “deceit.” Although appellant does not raise this specific point on appeal, this court has the duty to determine, su a sponte, the sufficiency of the information. Rule 30.20; City of Kansas City v. Harbin, 600 S.W.2d 589, 592 (Mo.App.1980). The amended information charged that appellant

in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. NewhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. City of Kansas v. HarbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. MondaineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McMikleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. VoylesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. DoeringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API