Epperson v. Midwest Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiff in error in a court of the state against the present defendant in -error and ,á corporation of the state of Wyoming called the Wyoming Iron Works Company (hereinafter called the ■ “Iron Com*623pany”). For convenience, tho parties will he referred to as on the record in the trial court.
The purpose of the action was to recover a judgment for damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff while at work as an employé of the iron company repairing a still in the plant of the refining company by reason of gas in some manner coming into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
- Floyt v. Shenango Furnace Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1911
- Bryce v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1903
- Chattanooga, R. & C. R. Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1890
- McAllister v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Culp v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Westland Oil Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Young v. SchmittDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1938
- Stogner v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.