Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Chattanooga, R. & C. R. Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee

Decided December 26, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. On motion to remand and on motion to dissolve injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, J.

This suit was commenced in the chancery court of the state, and arises from a contract made by complainant and defendant Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, J.une 28, 1888. The second paragraph of said contract says:

“For the use of the freight depot of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Company, the Chattanooga, Rome & Columbus Company will pay at the rate of 25 cents per ton for all freight received and delivered at the depot; this payment to include all services for unloading, delivering, and way-billing, and collecting the freight charges on merchandise of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. McKelly v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. Epperson v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Cates v. ELECTRIC POWER BD. OF METRO. GOV.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Risley v. City of UticaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API