Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Bank of America Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2013No. 12-CV-591PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

Appellants, Robin Floyd and Priscilla Fuller, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing, for lack of standing, the action they brought pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Pro-*249teetion Procedures Act (the “CPPA”).1 Although we conclude that the allegations of appellants’ Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) satisfied the concrete-injury-in-fact requirement of standing, we affirm the judgment of dismissal on the ground that the Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.2

I. Background

Appellants are customers of Bank of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mann v. Capital Health Care Associates, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. W.H. v. D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Parr v. EbrahimianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. ['HANCOCK v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API