Floyd v. Bank of America Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Robin Floyd and Priscilla Fuller, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing, for lack of standing, the action they brought pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Pro-*249teetion Procedures Act (the “CPPA”).1 Although we conclude that the allegations of appellants’ Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) satisfied the concrete-injury-in-fact requirement of standing, we affirm the judgment of dismissal on the ground that the Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.2
I. Background
Appellants are customers of Bank of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mann v. Capital Health Care Associates, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- W.H. v. D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Parr v. EbrahimianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ['HANCOCK v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.