Legal Opinion
['HANCOCK v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.']
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiffs in this putative class action allege that two retailers in Washington, D.C., Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Anthropologie, Inc. (collectively, the “defendants”), violated two D.C. consumer protection statutes by requesting customers’ ZIP codes in connection with consumer credit card purchases. See Compl. ¶¶ 1-5, ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 13, both counts in the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simon v. HofgardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Aim High Investment Group LLC v. Spectrum Laboratories, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023