Grossman v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This appeal raises the question of whether the evidence before the court below required a finding of entrapment as a matter of law.
Appellant was indicted for selling morphine to an undercover agent of the Alaska State Police.1 She pleaded not guilty, was tried by a jury, and was convicted and sentenced upon a verdict of guilty. At the close of the prosecution’s case, her counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal2 on the ground that the evidence required a finding of entrapment as a matter of law. The motion was denied and the issue *227of entrapment was submitted to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Masciale v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- People v. D'AngeloMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.