Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 15, 2012No. CA CR 11-909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge!

| Appellant Carle A. Freeman entered a conditional plea of no contest to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. His plea followed the denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of a search of his vehicle. He appeals contending that the trial court clearly erred in finding that he gave valid consent to search and in finding that he was not illegally detained. We affirm.

In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, this court conducts a de novo review based upon the totality of the circumstances, reversing only if the circuit court’s ruling is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Yarbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Menne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Pokatilov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Pokatilov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API