Pokatilov v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtLarry D. Vaught, Judge
_JjA Lonoke County jury found Alexander Pokatilov guilty of possession of a Schedule VI controlled substance (marijuana) with the purpose to deliver. On appeal, Pokatilov argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the circuit court abused its discretion by rejecting his proffered instruction on constructive possession; (3) the circuit court abused its discretion by refusing to reinstruct the jury with his proffered instruction on constructive possession; and (4) the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Granville Murphy v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Pokatilov v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Pokatilov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017