Legal Opinion

Pokatilov v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 2017No. CR-16-522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarry D. Vaught, Judge

_JjA Lonoke County jury found Alexander Pokatilov guilty of possession of a Schedule VI controlled substance (marijuana) with the purpose to deliver. On appeal, Pokatilov argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the circuit court abused its discretion by rejecting his proffered instruction on constructive possession; (3) the circuit court abused its discretion by refusing to reinstruct the jury with his proffered instruction on constructive possession; and (4) the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Granville Murphy v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Pokatilov v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Hoey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Pokatilov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API