Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 28, 2002No. CR 00-1373PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A NNABELLE CLINTON IMBER, Justice.
Appellant John T. .Scott was charged with manufacturing a controlled substance (methamphetamine), attempt to manufacture a controlled substance (methamphetamine), and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Mr. Scott contended below that the search of his home was unlawful and that evidence seized as a result of the search should be suppressed. The trial court denied the motion to suppress, and Mr. Scott entered a conditional plea of guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.