Legal Opinion
Streator Aqueduct Co. v. Smith
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided June 15, 1923No. 233PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EITZHENRY, District Judge.
The Streator Aqueduct Company, plaintiff, filed a bill asking the aid of a court of equity to prevent the Illinois Commerce Commission from enforcing the provisions of an order passed by it on May 25, 1922, finding that plaintiff’s schedule, filed under the provisions of the Illinois Public Utilities Act (Laws 1913, p. 459), and described as I. P. U. C. No. 2, did carry unjust and unreasonable rates, and ordering it to file a schedule in harmony with the provisions of the order; also, to prevent the Attorney General of Illinois from prosecuting the officers and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Du Page Utility Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Elmhurst v. Western United Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- City of Wheeling v. Natural Gas Co. of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.